EditorialEditorial Policy
Our guides cover money and risk, so we hold them to a high bar. Every educational page has a named author and a separate named reviewer, leads with an honest answer, and is checked against real on-chain data before it is published.
How we review
1. Brief
A content lead writes the brief, assigns a named author and a different named reviewer, and confirms the page targets a single primary topic with no overlap against the rest of the site.
2. Draft
The author writes answer-first: a clear definition up top, a worked on-chain example where relevant, and an honest risk note, following our answer-engine checklist.
3. Accuracy review
A separate reviewer verifies every number and worked example, clicks every on-chain and source link, confirms any audit references resolve, and checks that no overclaiming language slipped in.
4. Trust and legal pass
We confirm the risk note and not-financial-advice line are present and that any no-KYC or self-custody framing is honest and complete.
5. Schema and discoverability pass
Author, reviewer, and dates go into the structured data, the correct schema type is validated, and the page is added to our internal links and llms.txt so it is never orphaned.
6. Publish and maintain
We publish with a publication date, set a modified date in ISO 8601 on any edit, and refresh educational pages on a regular cadence.
Dating and corrections
Each page shows when it was published and last updated. When we learn that something is wrong or out of date, we correct it and update the modified date. If you spot an error, please reach out on our social channels.